Skip to content
Pips

NYT Pips Archive: What It Is, and What This Isn't

If you searched for the NYT pips archive, you were probably looking for a way to replay past New York Times Pips puzzles. This page is a straight answer about what that archive is, what it costs, and what this site does instead — because the honest version is more useful than pretending to be something we are not.

Sukie, Puzzle editor at EnergyPips

By Sukie · Puzzle editor

·

The short answer

EnergyPips is not affiliated with The New York Times and does not host their puzzles. We publish our own daily pips boards in the same format, with a complete free archive. If you specifically want NYT's boards, you need their Games subscription — we cannot and would not give you those.

What NYT Pips is

Pips is a daily domino-placement puzzle from The New York Times Games team, added to their lineup in 2025. You drag dominoes onto a grid divided into coloured regions, each carrying a constraint — an exact total, an equality, an inequality, or a comparison — and the board is solved when every region is satisfied. Three puzzles are published daily at easy, medium and hard.

The format caught on quickly, and so did the frustration that follows every NYT Games launch: the daily puzzle is partly free, and the archive is not.

Why the official archive is paywalled

Back-catalogue access is one of the clearest reasons to subscribe to a puzzle service, so it is reserved for subscribers. That is a legitimate business decision, not a conspiracy — the daily habit is free, the depth is paid.

It does mean that sites promising the “free NYT pips archive” are, at best, hosting recreations of boards they do not own. Some are transparent about that; many are not. It is worth knowing which kind of site you are on.

What this site does instead

We generate our own boards. The generator builds a valid domino layout first and adds region constraints on top, so every published board provably has a solution, and each one is re-verified before it goes live. Boards are deterministic by date, so a given date always yields the same puzzle and an archive link always means the same thing.

The rules vocabulary is shared with the NYT version, and that is fine — game mechanics are not copyrightable, which is why hundreds of sites publish sudoku and crosswords without any of them owning the format. What is protected is specific expression: their name, their branding, and their particular boards. We use none of those.

Honest comparison

NYT PipsEnergyPips
Daily puzzlePartly freeFree
Full archiveSubscribers onlyFree, all dates
DifficultiesThreeThree
Account requiredFor archiveNever
BoardsTheirsOurs, generated here
Editorial polishHand-tuned by an editorial teamMachine-generated, machine-verified

That last row matters and we are not going to hide it. A human editorial team tunes individual boards for elegance in a way a generator does not. What we offer instead is volume, permanence and zero cost — which is the better trade if your goal is to practise rather than to savour one perfectly-crafted puzzle a day.

Questions

Is this the NYT pips archive?
No. EnergyPips is an independent site with no affiliation to The New York Times. We do not host or reproduce NYT puzzles. The boards here are generated by our own engine.
Can I play the official NYT pips archive for free?
Not in full. The New York Times offers limited free access to its daily puzzles, with the complete back catalogue reserved for Games subscribers. Anyone claiming to give you the official archive for free is republishing content they do not have rights to.
What is the difference between this archive and the NYT one?
Different boards, same format. The rules vocabulary is shared — dominoes into regions with sum, equal, not-equal and comparison constraints — but every specific board differs, and ours are all free.